Ĭrossland D, Kneller W, Wilcock R (2018) Intoxicated eyewitnesses: prevalence and procedures according to England’s police officers. Ĭrossland D, Kneller W, Wilcock R (2016) Intoxicated witnesses: testing the validity of the Alcohol Myopia Theory. Ĭhristiansen BA, Goldman MS (1983) Alcohol-related expectancies versus demographic/background variables in the prediction of adolescent drinking. Ĭarli LL (1999) Cognitive reconstruction, hindsight, and reactions to victims and perpetrators. īrewer N, Potter R, Fisher RP, Bond N, Luszcz MA (1999) Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 501–525īrewer N, Burke A (2002) Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. In: Lindsay R, Ross D, Read J, Toglia M (eds) The handbook of eyewitness psychology: memory for people. īoyce M, Beaudry JL, Lindsay RC (2007) Belief of eyewitness identification evidence. (00)00154-4īornstein BH (1999) The ecological validity of jury simulations: is the jury still out? Law Hum Behav 23(1):75–91. (78)90210-4īorjesson WI, Dunn ME (2001) Alcohol expectancies of women and men in relation to alcohol use and perceptions of the effects of alcohol on the opposite sex. īirnbaum IM, Parker ES, Hartley JT, Noble EP (1978) Alcohol and memory: retrieval processes. īenton TR, Ross DF, Bradshaw E, Thomas WN, Bradshaw GS (2006) Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. īell BE, Loftus EF (1989) Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. īell BE, Loftus EF (1988) Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. īayless SJ, Harvey AJ, Kneller W, Frowd CD (2018) Do intoxicated witnesses produce poor facial composite images? Psychopharmacology 235(10):2991–3003. Īramburu B, Leigh BC (1991) For better or worse: attributions about drunken aggression toward male and female victims. Īltman CM, Schreiber CN, McQuiston D, Hagsand A, Cervera J (2018) Witnesses’ memory for events and faces under elevated levels of intoxication. Īltman CM, McQuiston D, Schreiber Compo N (2019) How elevated BAC level and identification format affect eyewitness memory: a field study. Findings are discussed in relation to the criminal justice system and future research.Īdams SL, McNeil DW (1991) Negative alcohol expectancies reconsidered. With no main effect of intoxication, the testimony of an intoxicated witness itself was not perceived as less credible. Subsequent analysis of variance analyses indicated that knowledge of the witness’s intoxication and a less complete account led to lower credibility ratings. From the credibility ratings, a single principal component analysis factor was extracted. Within each condition, the testimony was either long or short, with the former being more complete. 08%) during the crime, with half of jurors being provided with this information. Although sober when interviewed, witnesses were either sober, moderately, or severely intoxicated (BAC under/over. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimising co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.To ascertain whether intoxication at the time of a crime affects a witness’s credibility with mock jurors, 240 jury eligible individuals completed an online questionnaire rating the convincingness, confidence, competence, honesty, believability, consistency, credibility, accuracy, and completeness of one of six witness testimonies. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. This paper presents an online study in which participants (n = 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance (Monds et al. Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Bartlett, G., Gawrylowicz, J., Frings, D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |